Vulnerabilities
Projects
Vulnerability Disclosure
About Us
Contact Us
Mend.io Vulnerability Database
What is a WS vulnerability ID?
What is an MSC vulnerability ID?
We found results for “”
CVE-2019-16786
Good to know:
Date: December 20, 2019
Waitress through version 1.3.1 would parse the Transfer-Encoding header and only look for a single string value, if that value was not chunked it would fall through and use the Content-Length header instead. According to the HTTP standard Transfer-Encoding should be a comma separated list, with the inner-most encoding first, followed by any further transfer codings, ending with chunked. Requests sent with: "Transfer-Encoding: gzip, chunked" would incorrectly get ignored, and the request would use a Content-Length header instead to determine the body size of the HTTP message. This could allow for Waitress to treat a single request as multiple requests in the case of HTTP pipelining. This issue is fixed in Waitress 1.4.0.
Language: Python
Severity Score
Related Resources (15)
Severity Score
Weakness Type (CWE)
Inconsistent Interpretation of HTTP Requests ('HTTP Request Smuggling')
CWE-444Top Fix
CVSS v3.1
| Base Score: |
|
|---|---|
| Attack Vector (AV): | NETWORK |
| Attack Complexity (AC): | HIGH |
| Privileges Required (PR): | LOW |
| User Interaction (UI): | NONE |
| Scope (S): | CHANGED |
| Confidentiality (C): | HIGH |
| Integrity (I): | LOW |
| Availability (A): | NONE |
CVSS v2
| Base Score: |
|
|---|---|
| Access Vector (AV): | NETWORK |
| Access Complexity (AC): | LOW |
| Authentication (AU): | NONE |
| Confidentiality (C): | NONE |
| Integrity (I): | PARTIAL |
| Availability (A): | NONE |
| Additional information: |