Vulnerabilities
Projects
Vulnerability Disclosure
About Us
Contact Us
Mend.io Vulnerability Database
What is a WS vulnerability ID?
What is an MSC vulnerability ID?
We found results for “”
CVE-2020-11077
Good to know:
Date: May 22, 2020
In Puma (RubyGem) before 4.3.5 and 3.12.6, a client could smuggle a request through a proxy, causing the proxy to send a response back to another unknown client. If the proxy uses persistent connections and the client adds another request in via HTTP pipelining, the proxy may mistake it as the first request's body. Puma, however, would see it as two requests, and when processing the second request, send back a response that the proxy does not expect. If the proxy has reused the persistent connection to Puma to send another request for a different client, the second response from the first client will be sent to the second client. This is a similar but different vulnerability from CVE-2020-11076. The problem has been fixed in Puma 3.12.6 and Puma 4.3.5.
Language: Ruby
Severity Score
Related Resources (11)
Severity Score
Weakness Type (CWE)
Inconsistent Interpretation of HTTP Requests ('HTTP Request Smuggling')
CWE-444Top Fix
CVSS v3.1
| Base Score: |
|
|---|---|
| Attack Vector (AV): | NETWORK |
| Attack Complexity (AC): | HIGH |
| Privileges Required (PR): | NONE |
| User Interaction (UI): | NONE |
| Scope (S): | CHANGED |
| Confidentiality (C): | NONE |
| Integrity (I): | HIGH |
| Availability (A): | NONE |
CVSS v2
| Base Score: |
|
|---|---|
| Access Vector (AV): | NETWORK |
| Access Complexity (AC): | LOW |
| Authentication (AU): | NONE |
| Confidentiality (C): | NONE |
| Integrity (I): | PARTIAL |
| Availability (A): | NONE |
| Additional information: |