Mend.io Vulnerability Database
The largest open source vulnerability database
What is a Vulnerability ID?
New vulnerability? Tell us about it!
CVE-2026-33731
Published:June 22, 2026
Updated:June 24, 2026
Summary The Authorize.Net webhook handler at "plugin/AuthorizeNet/webhook.php" contains a signature verification bypass that allows an attacker to forge webhook requests with arbitrary payment amounts and target user IDs. By supplying a valid transaction ID from a small legitimate purchase, the attacker bypasses signature validation and credits arbitrary wallet balances to any user account via attacker-controlled payload fields. Details Three flaws combine into an exploit chain: 1. Signature Bypass via OR Logic (webhook.php:33) if (!$parsed['signatureValid'] && (empty($txnInfo) || !empty($txnInfo['error']))) { http_response_code(401); echo 'invalid signature'; exit; } The webhook is rejected only when both conditions are true: the signature is invalid AND the transaction lookup fails. If the attacker supplies a real transaction ID (e.g., from their own $1 purchase), "getTransactionDetails()" succeeds and returns valid data, so the second condition is false. The invalid signature is silently ignored. 2. Payload Values Override API-Fetched Values (AuthorizeNet.php:169-171, webhook.php:44-48) In "analyzeTransactionFromWebhook()", "users_id" and "amount" are extracted from the attacker-controlled webhook payload first: $users_id = isset($metadata['users_id']) ? (int)$metadata['users_id'] : null; $amount = isset($payload['amount']) ? (float)$payload['amount'] : ...; The fallback logic in webhook.php only applies when the analysis values are empty/falsy: if (!$analysis['users_id'] && !empty($txnInfo['users_id'])) { $analysis['users_id'] = (int)$txnInfo['users_id']; } if (!$analysis['amount'] && isset($txnInfo['amount'])) { $analysis['amount'] = (float)$txnInfo['amount']; } Since the forged payload already provides both values, the authoritative API-fetched values are never used. 3. Missing Approval Check (webhook.php:61-75) The code checks only that "users_id" and "amount" are non-empty before calling "processSinglePayment()". The "isApproved" field is computed in "analyzeTransactionFromWebhook()" (line 222-228) but never verified before crediting the wallet at line 68-75. PoC Prerequisites: Attacker has a low-privileged account on the AVideo instance and has made at least one legitimate small Authorize.Net purchase (e.g., $1.00), noting the transaction ID (e.g., "60123456789"). 4. Immediately after the purchase completes (to race the legitimate webhook), send a forged webhook: curl -X POST https://target.com/plugin/AuthorizeNet/webhook.php -H 'Content-Type: application/json' -d '{ "eventType": "net.authorize.payment.authcapture.created", "payload": { "id": "60123456789", "amount": 99999.99, "responseCode": 1, "metadata": { "users_id": 2 } } }' 5. The signature check fails (no "X-ANET-Signature" header), but "getTransactionDetails('60123456789')" succeeds because it is a real transaction. The OR condition on line 33 is not fully satisfied, so execution continues. 6. "analyzeTransactionFromWebhook()" uses the forged payload's "amount: 99999.99" and "metadata.users_id: 2". 7. "processSinglePayment()" credits $99,999.99 to user ID 2's wallet via "addBalance()". 8. The dedup key is "sha1('net.authorize.payment.authcapture.created' . '60123456789')", so the legitimate webhook arriving later is silently discarded as a duplicate. 9. The attacker can repeat with new transaction IDs from additional small purchases for cumulative balance inflation. Impact - Wallet balance inflation: Attacker credits arbitrary amounts to any user's wallet without corresponding payment, bypassing the payment gateway's actual charge amount. - Premium content access: Inflated wallet balance allows purchasing all paid/premium video content without real payment. - Subscription fraud: By including "plans_id" in forged metadata, the attacker can activate premium subscriptions (webhook.php:86-134) without corresponding payment. - Financial loss: Platform owner loses revenue from fraudulently accessed premium content and services. Recommended Fix 1. Reject webhooks with invalid signatures unconditionally — the transaction lookup should only be used for data enrichment after signature validation passes: // webhook.php line 33 — FIX: reject on invalid signature alone if (!$parsed['signatureValid']) { _error_log('[Authorize.Net webhook] Bad signature'); http_response_code(401); echo 'invalid signature'; exit; } 2. Use API-fetched values as authoritative — in webhook.php lines 44-55, invert the precedence so "$txnInfo" values always override payload values: // Always prefer API-fetched values over payload values if (!empty($txnInfo['users_id'])) { $analysis['users_id'] = (int)$txnInfo['users_id']; } if (isset($txnInfo['amount'])) { $analysis['amount'] = (float)$txnInfo['amount']; } 3. Check "isApproved" before processing — add a gate before "processSinglePayment()": if (!$analysis['isApproved']) { _error_log('[Authorize.Net webhook] Transaction not approved'); http_response_code(400); echo 'transaction not approved'; exit; }
Affected Packages
https://github.com/WWBN/AVideo.git (GITHUB):
Affected version(s) >=10.4 <29.0
Fix Suggestion:
Update to version 29.0
wwbn/avideo (PHP):
Affected version(s) >=10.4 <29.0
Fix Suggestion:
Update to version 29.0
Do you need more information?
Contact Us
CVSS v4
Base Score:
7.1
Attack Vector
NETWORK
Attack Complexity
LOW
Attack Requirements
NONE
Privileges Required
LOW
User Interaction
NONE
Vulnerable System Confidentiality
NONE
Vulnerable System Integrity
HIGH
Vulnerable System Availability
NONE
Subsequent System Confidentiality
NONE
Subsequent System Integrity
NONE
Subsequent System Availability
NONE
CVSS v3
Base Score:
6.5
Attack Vector
NETWORK
Attack Complexity
LOW
Privileges Required
LOW
User Interaction
NONE
Scope
UNCHANGED
Confidentiality
NONE
Integrity
HIGH
Availability
NONE
Weakness Type (CWE)
Insufficient Verification of Data Authenticity