Impact A privilege escalation vulnerability affects Woodpecker instances using the Kubernetes backend. The pipeline option "backend_options.kubernetes.serviceAccountName" was passed directly to the pod spec without any admin gating. Who is impacted: any operator running the Kubernetes backend. Any user with Push permission on a connected repository can run pipeline pods under an arbitrary ServiceAccount in the pipeline namespace, gaining that account's RBAC permissions. If a privileged ServiceAccount is reachable in that namespace, this can lead to secret exfiltration (database credentials, API keys, TLS certs) and full cluster takeover. Patches https://github.com/woodpecker-ci/woodpecker/pull/6792 Workarounds Operators who cannot upgrade immediately can mitigate by any of: - Restrict Push access on repositories connected to the Kubernetes-backed instance to trusted users only. - Harden the pipeline namespace: ensure no privileged ServiceAccount exists or is bound in the namespace where pipeline pods run; keep the "default" ServiceAccount minimally privileged. - Disable ServiceAccount token automounting for ServiceAccounts that should not be used by pipelines. - Enforce an admission policy (e.g. OPA/Gatekeeper, Kyverno, or a ValidatingAdmissionPolicy) that rejects pipeline pods setting an unexpected "serviceAccountName". - Use a dedicated, isolated namespace per org/instance with no sensitive RBAC bindings. Resources - Vulnerable option introduced in commit "609ba481b5e912f59aaae8ca7bc22b44523c5e37" - Affected versions: "v1.0.0" through "v3.15.0" - Source: "pipeline/backend/kubernetes/backend_options.go" (field "ServiceAccountName"), "pipeline/backend/kubernetes/pod.go" (assigned to pod spec with no gating)